Hi Clovis1122, even tho we texted sometimes back then, I can't really say that i know you for good, so i don't know if you posted this to troll and make fun of (me? or guys who try to act in the interest of the game and the players?), or if you posted this believing it was a reasonable thing to do and believing that what you wrote is a good point (I find hard to believe this second one is the case, but I've been told that apperently it usually is).
But, wheter the case is, I want to thank you for it, since your post made me come back here in this long thread to portray the situation of the game to everyone, including those who are to busy in real life and have not been around theese past times.
1
The activity of the game is today at his minimum since i joined atwar (april 2020). This is not an opinion, this is an undeniable fact, even the game owner cant negate it (he is indeed arguing that the decrease of the activity has just followed his natural course that already begun back then and that was not influenced by banning the players that contributed keeping high standars in the skill and the gameplay; even if this is in my opinion logically wrong, it is impossible to prove it with mere numbers). The activity decreased by number of active players (in the rapid rooms, in the casual rooms, espetially the newbie one, and of course in the coalition war rooms, and in the active players in the server in total), aswell as in the numbers of duels and wars played (wich, for Dave and for you, are totally irrelevant apperently), and also in the numbers of scenarios played and hosted (including the decrease in the quality of those, since they commonly have some requirement to be played properly). Once again those are not opinions, theese are things we saw with our eyes. You can ask to the people that were active in the game, not just me but everyone from many different backgrounds and different parts of the community (not just the competitive that you guys seems to hate): Palm, Tungston, Alpen, Metyu, Dominicano, IHY, Ted, Khauman, Hineni, Swenden, wojoo, Barstool, Spartans300, pvppro, Smugler, Estus, ulvi, fosforat, Puma, Tiger, Stopmonkey, Alfa159, CroatiaSoccer, and others i am forgetting to mention right now. They will all tell you the same thing, because they have been HERE trying to play the game (in the many ways it can be explored), while you have been busy or hidden waiting for some moment like yesterday to do your deed...
2
Yesterday events are proof to a couple of things. One being the impressive selfishness from a great portion of scenario players and their inability to be nice to other people and to each other. The second is what have been said by me and others, and confirmed by comments i can't see anymore, probably removed: the fact that no matter how many people you will bann, toxic people will always be around, and if bullying other players like you did yesterday, preventing them from learning anything and just making fun of them is not toxic enough for you, then I very much question your ability to draw the "line" that has been referred to about the toxic matter.
For those who were not here I will briefly give some context of what happened.
You and other scenario players that have been in hybernation for years (in the rapid games lobby apart from random and troll games, because i can already hear you typing "wdym i play some casual stuff" or "hey I just played that 50k world game with 3 people last week"), all came togheter to play one ww2 game (NEU), probably scheduled from the discord of scenario people that i left years ago exactly because of the trollness I spoke above^^ And in this game you people picked all accordingly the same faction leaving every other people on purpose picks from the other faction, unfortunatly the game started without me realizing what was happening (I was almost ending an other game, as GIGI said i should have left that turn 1 not turn 7). When it became obvious the tiring outcome that would have been imposed to players like Estus or Alfa or Natka i left the game taking responsability for it to end (I was of course not the victim, I tried to save the victims from your bullying fun and humiliation).
3
This kind of toxic little games have always happened wheter Dave have seen them or not, but as Grand Inquisitor said, if you have more players, if you have a decently active community, you will also manage to host and play games that make sense, that are actually good, nice, and fun (for everyone in them).
In fact, speaking of scenario rapid games (since you are hostiles to the competitive part of the game), there are really few people left, to the point that is daily impossible to host a scenario that takes more then 4 people (and I am speaking about peak times like weekend evening), and I must thank those few that are still around (like Barstool, Metyu or Alfa, a new guy that, despite the infintite list of problems of this dying game, is still heroicly trying to fit in and learn stuff), if that little westfront of 4 people sometimes start.
4
This last point is more of a personal one. For the whole time I've been in this game.
You have no fucking idea about the energy I have always put in trying to host scenario games, and make them balanced and fun for everyone. Every time when there has been a small light of chance of starting those ww1 or neu or ostfront or simplified ww2, I've always tried to reach everyone (espetially when I still was in the discord server) and help the hosts of the games sharing link where it was possible and profitable, and always sending private messages to everyone to arrange balanced teams and explaining (lowranks espetially) the need and the benefit of switching (not to mention the coaching to the lowranks aswell). I've always tried to reach everyone and make the best for everyone INCLUDING you or siri or others. Pointless to say that I will no longer waste my time with you hopeless people. As i said in he beginning I've never known you for good, I am certainly not interested in doing it now.
I really pray that the game as a whole is not hopeless aswell, but owner ignoring feedbacks suggest otherwise. I still don't understand what is the danger in unbanning people that are not hackers, without making them moderators or vice-president-whatever. I don't understand it because in 7 pages of thread it has not been said once. It has been said that low activity is better then bad activity (where I agree), but it hasnt been written what is exaclty this "bad". Is it farming or unsposrtmanship? We had it, we will always have it. Is it toxicity? Well, read above Dave, you will never get rid of that, unless you bann everyone that speaks, including and espetially your subordinates.