Changing strategy in game

Should be option to, would give more tactical options, but lets same before starting game every 25t or 50t or 100t etc

Start off as blitz ukr and change as gw t25 legit

Scritto da Guest, 06.02.2017 at 21:28

Actually lets just have 1 strategy, all of them put together cause why not

thats just not "strategic"...Faggot...

Scritto da 4nic, 06.02.2017 at 18:34

Start off as blitz ukr and change as gw t25 legit

that's just dumb

Scritto da Samurai, 07.02.2017 at 00:40

Scritto da 4nic, 06.02.2017 at 18:34

Start off as blitz ukr and change as gw t25 legit

that's just dumb

It was a joke, this guy posts stupid ideas all the time and i post obvious jokes on them all, you're just mentally challenged.

But if you buy 500 militia with Imperialist and then switch to GW...

Scritto da Guest, 07.02.2017 at 02:11

Scritto da Samurai, 07.02.2017 at 00:39

Scritto da Guest, 06.02.2017 at 21:28

Actually lets just have 1 strategy, all of them put together cause why not

thats just not "strategic"...Faggot...

it was a joke, this guy posts stupid ideas all the time and i post obvious jokes on them all, you're just mentally challenged.

why is it stupid, never seen changing tactic in football game, or whatever sport, its known in history few changes of tactic in war changed winners of battles and wars

Scritto da MURAD IV, 07.02.2017 at 10:44

Scritto da Guest, 07.02.2017 at 02:11

Scritto da Samurai, 07.02.2017 at 00:39

Scritto da Guest, 06.02.2017 at 21:28

Actually lets just have 1 strategy, all of them put together cause why not

thats just not "strategic"...Faggot...

it was a joke, this guy posts stupid ideas all the time and i post obvious jokes on them all, you're just mentally challenged.

why is it stupid, never seen changing tactic in football game, or whatever sport, its known in history few changes of tactic in war changed winners of battles and wars

It may resemble real life, but switching strats can lead to OP combos. It might work better if you had to pay a bunch of money to switch, which matches both realism and (hopefully) balance.

Scritto da MURAD IV, 07.02.2017 at 10:44

Scritto da Guest, 07.02.2017 at 02:11

Scritto da Samurai, 07.02.2017 at 00:39

Scritto da Guest, 06.02.2017 at 21:28

Actually lets just have 1 strategy, all of them put together cause why not

thats just not "strategic"...Faggot...

it was a joke, this guy posts stupid ideas all the time and i post obvious jokes on them all, you're just mentally challenged.

why is it stupid, never seen changing tactic in football game, or whatever sport, its known in history few changes of tactic in war changed winners of battles and wars

Its not going to be balance.

I said every 25 or 50 t, by that time eu cw is probably over, not every turn

Scritto da MURAD IV, 07.02.2017 at 16:29

I said every 25 or 50 t, by that time eu cw is probably over, not every turn

Theres no neee for that man. Just use what you chose

Scritto da Guest, 07.02.2017 at 18:35

Scritto da MURAD IV, 07.02.2017 at 16:29

I said every 25 or 50 t, by that time eu cw is probably over, not every turn

Theres no neee for that man. Just use what you chose

sometime i dont need, sometime i would use, why would be we stucked with only one option,lol i hate closed minds

Scritto da MURAD IV, 08.02.2017 at 10:19

Scritto da Guest, 07.02.2017 at 18:35

Scritto da MURAD IV, 07.02.2017 at 16:29

I said every 25 or 50 t, by that time eu cw is probably over, not every turn

Theres no neee for that man. Just use what you chose

sometime i dont need, sometime i would use, why would be we stucked with only one option,lol i hate closed minds

You dont have the skill

Scritto da Guest, 08.02.2017 at 10:45

Scritto da MURAD IV, 08.02.2017 at 10:19

Scritto da Guest, 07.02.2017 at 18:35

Scritto da MURAD IV, 07.02.2017 at 16:29

I said every 25 or 50 t, by that time eu cw is probably over, not every turn

Theres no neee for that man. Just use what you chose

sometime i dont need, sometime i would use, why would be we stucked with only one option,lol i hate closed minds

You dont have the skill

at least u have, future of this game is so bright with yours brain

And so we fall once more to insults...

Scritto da Greenflame, 08.02.2017 at 13:39

And so we fall once more to insults...

You're obviously new to this, aren't you?

I feel sorry for not having warned you before joining in. Anyway, welcome!

We can all agree that changing strategy at Turn 1 is a good idea. Afterward it's quite controversial.

Scritto da clovis1122, 08.02.2017 at 19:02

We can all agree that changing strategy at Turn 1 is a good idea. Afterward it's quite controversial.

It can also be good if you don't know a map / scenario and end up choosing a terrible strategy for that certain scenario (like imperialist when zombies cost 0...)

Scritto da clovis1122, 08.02.2017 at 19:02

We can all agree that changing strategy at Turn 1 is a good idea. Afterward it's quite controversial.

turn one is pointless , i talk changing in later stages of game if its more suitable, like in chess u have opening, middle game, and late stage game, why no option for different periods to change strategy

Scritto da MURAD IV, 09.02.2017 at 12:57

Scritto da clovis1122, 08.02.2017 at 19:02

We can all agree that changing strategy at Turn 1 is a good idea. Afterward it's quite controversial.

turn one is pointless , i talk changing in later stages of game if its more suitable, like in chess u have opening, middle game, and late stage game, why no option for different periods to change strategy

True. However, one must also consider balance and practicality. While strategy changes are cool and open up new options, certain OP combos could dominate the game and ultimately reduce the number of competitive options available.

Scritto da Greenflame, 09.02.2017 at 13:43

Scritto da MURAD IV, 09.02.2017 at 12:57

Scritto da clovis1122, 08.02.2017 at 19:02

We can all agree that changing strategy at Turn 1 is a good idea. Afterward it's quite controversial.

turn one is pointless , i talk changing in later stages of game if its more suitable, like in chess u have opening, middle game, and late stage game, why no option for different periods to change strategy

True. However, one must also consider balance and practicality. While strategy changes are cool and open up new options, certain OP combos could dominate the game and ultimately reduce the number of competitive options available.

isnt that what made great commander/generals, they had better strategies then others even with smaller numbers

Scritto da MURAD IV, 09.02.2017 at 14:27

Scritto da Greenflame, 09.02.2017 at 13:43

Scritto da MURAD IV, 09.02.2017 at 12:57

Scritto da clovis1122, 08.02.2017 at 19:02

We can all agree that changing strategy at Turn 1 is a good idea. Afterward it's quite controversial.

turn one is pointless , i talk changing in later stages of game if its more suitable, like in chess u have opening, middle game, and late stage game, why no option for different periods to change strategy

True. However, one must also consider balance and practicality. While strategy changes are cool and open up new options, certain OP combos could dominate the game and ultimately reduce the number of competitive options available.

isnt that what made great commander/generals, they had better strategies then others even with smaller numbers

I agree that changing strategies is cool and realistic. My argument is about balancing and unseen repercussions. What might happen is that a certain combination of strategies will become so powerful that the game becomes severely unbalanced / limited.

Scritto da MURAD IV, 05.02.2017 at 11:45

Should be option to, would give more tactical options, but lets same before starting game every 25t or 50t or 100t etc

They should let to siwtch to non premium strategies after t25 but it should cost 50k money for being fair

Scritto da Greenflame, 09.02.2017 at 14:35

Scritto da MURAD IV, 09.02.2017 at 14:27

Scritto da Greenflame, 09.02.2017 at 13:43

Scritto da MURAD IV, 09.02.2017 at 12:57

Scritto da clovis1122, 08.02.2017 at 19:02

We can all agree that changing strategy at Turn 1 is a good idea. Afterward it's quite controversial.

turn one is pointless , i talk changing in later stages of game if its more suitable, like in chess u have opening, middle game, and late stage game, why no option for different periods to change strategy

True. However, one must also consider balance and practicality. While strategy changes are cool and open up new options, certain OP combos could dominate the game and ultimately reduce the number of competitive options available.

isnt that what made great commander/generals, they had better strategies then others even with smaller numbers

I agree that changing strategies is cool and realistic. My argument is about balancing and unseen repercussions. What might happen is that a certain combination of strategies will become so powerful that the game becomes severely unbalanced / limited.

isnt allyfagging making game more unbalanced then changing tactics, tactic cant have unseen repercussions, although it can change winner or winners of the game

Scritto da MURAD IV, 10.02.2017 at 10:42

isnt allyfagging making game more unbalanced then changing tactics, tactic cant have unseen repercussions, although it can change winner or winners of the game

My point is that the ability to change tactics may invent / create very strong setups, in which case players are forced to use those few setups or get slaughtered, ultimately reducing the fun and possibilities of the game. While allyfagging is a problem, shifting game balances won't help.

However, I like your idea and would like to see it work, but I'm afraid that it needs to be refined first.

Scritto da clovis1122, 08.02.2017 at 19:02

We can all agree that changing strategy at Turn 1 is a good idea. Afterward it's quite controversial.

wait a moment...can i use my op ukraine sm expansion then change to ukr gw afterwards?

Scritto da MURAD IV, 05.02.2017 at 11:45

Should be option to, would give more tactical options, but lets same before starting game every 25t or 50t or 100t etc

Do you do heavy drugs all day then hop on the internet, where do you come up with this shit lol. Not once have you come up with a single viable idea or even came up with a decent arguement for why it is. Here is a summary of every suggestion. "Lol this shit lit, let's make flying tanks cause 420 blaze it is a holiday and Katty perry has rocket launcher titties in that one video so why not, makes me op fire bro, buy my mix tape on sound cloud". Then I'm sitting here litterally dying from the reprocuations your ideas would bring, and it's not just one of its all of them. If you want to pretend to be an overlord brony of mordor with tanks that have 56 range start making maps. Because the last good 5 or 6 things you came up with made my eyes bleed. No offense though your a good goiy. Just bad, I mean aweful, wait miserable at ideas to be implimented in aw. The best things they can do right now is set sp to 0 for all maps and have map creators submit maps for review to have sp percentages given to them.

Again no offense this is just autistic. So play stupid games get stupid prizes you know xD?

Scritto da Helly, 16.02.2017 at 02:32

Scritto da MURAD IV, 05.02.2017 at 11:45

Should be option to, would give more tactical options, but lets same before starting game every 25t or 50t or 100t etc

Do you do heavy drugs all day then hop on the internet, where do you come up with this shit lol. Not once have you come up with a single viable idea or even came up with a decent arguement for why it is. Here is a summary of every suggestion. "Lol this shit lit, let's make flying tanks cause 420 blaze it is a holiday and Katty perry has rocket launcher titties in that one video so why not, makes me op fire bro, buy my mix tape on sound cloud". Then I'm sitting here litterally dying from the reprocuations your ideas would bring, and it's not just one of its all of them. If you want to pretend to be an overlord brony of mordor with tanks that have 56 range start making maps. Because the last good 5 or 6 things you came up with made my eyes bleed. No offense though your a good goiy. Just bad, I mean aweful, wait miserable at ideas to be implimented in aw. The best things they can do right now is set sp to 0 for all maps and have map creators submit maps for review to have sp percentages given to them.

Again no offense this is just autistic. So play stupid games get stupid prizes you know xD?

i h8 to write much, btw if u think its stupid idea, its just yours opinion, so u want me to to say its better to be stucked whole game with one tactic instead option of changing it, ofc there would be reprocuations in game, for example there wouldnt be certainity that someone will win or loose, i never proposed flying tanks or something, i think i had some good ideas, like pause in game for example etc,turn or two, it wouldnt be so much reprocuations changing tactic every 50t, rare are players that have nerves that stay in games longer than that anyways, btw i never use drugs, i m muslim its forbidden strictly by our religion, even if i argument it, u ll stay with yours old opinion so its just waste of time, to fight with ppl over net, i would do maps, but current tool is to complicated to use for me, i didnt draw on comp never, its hard to make what i want specially borders etc, i hope new tool will be simplified,when i proposed 56 range, yea i said world map needs changing, cause its unrealistic that USA aviation need 7 or 8 t to get to JPN, if we count one turn as week or month

Scritto da MURAD IV, 16.02.2017 at 11:19

Scritto da Helly, 16.02.2017 at 02:32

Scritto da MURAD IV, 05.02.2017 at 11:45

Should be option to, would give more tactical options, but lets same before starting game every 25t or 50t or 100t etc

Do you do heavy drugs all day then hop on the internet, where do you come up with this shit lol. Not once have you come up with a single viable idea or even came up with a decent arguement for why it is. Here is a summary of every suggestion. "Lol this shit lit, let's make flying tanks cause 420 blaze it is a holiday and Katty perry has rocket launcher titties in that one video so why not, makes me op fire bro, buy my mix tape on sound cloud". Then I'm sitting here litterally dying from the reprocuations your ideas would bring, and it's not just one of its all of them. If you want to pretend to be an overlord brony of mordor with tanks that have 56 range start making maps. Because the last good 5 or 6 things you came up with made my eyes bleed. No offense though your a good goiy. Just bad, I mean aweful, wait miserable at ideas to be implimented in aw. The best things they can do right now is set sp to 0 for all maps and have map creators submit maps for review to have sp percentages given to them.

Again no offense this is just autistic. So play stupid games get stupid prizes you know xD?

i h8 to write much, btw if u think its stupid idea, its just yours opinion, so u want me to to say its better to be stucked whole game with one tactic instead option of changing it, ofc there would be reprocuations in game, for example there wouldnt be certainity that someone will win or loose, i never proposed flying tanks or something, i think i had some good ideas, like pause in game for example etc,turn or two, it wouldnt be so much reprocuations changing tactic every 50t, rare are players that have nerves that stay in games longer than that anyways, btw i never use drugs, i m muslim its forbidden strictly by our religion, even if i argument it, u ll stay with yours old opinion so its just waste of time, to fight with ppl over net, i would do maps, but current tool is to complicated to use for me, i didnt draw on comp never, its hard to make what i want specially borders etc, i hope new tool will be simplified,when i proposed 56 range, yea i said world map needs changing, cause its unrealistic that USA aviation need 7 or 8 t to get to JPN, if we count one turn as week or month

Ok I take it back pausing game was not a bad idea.

Scritto da Helly, 16.02.2017 at 15:06

Scritto da MURAD IV, 16.02.2017 at 11:19

Scritto da Helly, 16.02.2017 at 02:32

Scritto da MURAD IV, 05.02.2017 at 11:45

Should be option to, would give more tactical options, but lets same before starting game every 25t or 50t or 100t etc

Do you do heavy drugs all day then hop on the internet, where do you come up with this shit lol. Not once have you come up with a single viable idea or even came up with a decent arguement for why it is. Here is a summary of every suggestion. "Lol this shit lit, let's make flying tanks cause 420 blaze it is a holiday and Katty perry has rocket launcher titties in that one video so why not, makes me op fire bro, buy my mix tape on sound cloud". Then I'm sitting here litterally dying from the reprocuations your ideas would bring, and it's not just one of its all of them. If you want to pretend to be an overlord brony of mordor with tanks that have 56 range start making maps. Because the last good 5 or 6 things you came up with made my eyes bleed. No offense though your a good goiy. Just bad, I mean aweful, wait miserable at ideas to be implimented in aw. The best things they can do right now is set sp to 0 for all maps and have map creators submit maps for review to have sp percentages given to them.

Again no offense this is just autistic. So play stupid games get stupid prizes you know xD?

i h8 to write much, btw if u think its stupid idea, its just yours opinion, so u want me to to say its better to be stucked whole game with one tactic instead option of changing it, ofc there would be reprocuations in game, for example there wouldnt be certainity that someone will win or loose, i never proposed flying tanks or something, i think i had some good ideas, like pause in game for example etc,turn or two, it wouldnt be so much reprocuations changing tactic every 50t, rare are players that have nerves that stay in games longer than that anyways, btw i never use drugs, i m muslim its forbidden strictly by our religion, even if i argument it, u ll stay with yours old opinion so its just waste of time, to fight with ppl over net, i would do maps, but current tool is to complicated to use for me, i didnt draw on comp never, its hard to make what i want specially borders etc, i hope new tool will be simplified,when i proposed 56 range, yea i said world map needs changing, cause its unrealistic that USA aviation need 7 or 8 t to get to JPN, if we count one turn as week or month

Ok I take it back pausing game was not a bad idea.

i had few more not maybe great, but still interesting, like changing reinf on default map and economy by current world statistics